Asian vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Asian
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Asians
Immigrants from Jordan
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 542,084,939 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,116,498 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Asian | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.20% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 11.7% |
| Range | 7.9% | 11.5% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.94% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.94% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Immigrants from Jordan by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |