Tohono O'odham vs Czech Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Czech
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Czechs
31.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Czech Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,687,978 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 31.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,035,895 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 129.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Czech |
Minimum | 9.9% | 0.42% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 59.4% |
Range | 90.1% | 59.0% |
Mean | 46.5% | 13.9% |
Median | 39.8% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.3% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.0% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 7.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Puerto Rican (32.5%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and Pima (29.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Greek (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Croatian (13.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |