Tohono O'odham vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Czechoslovakian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Czechoslovakians
31.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,687,978 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 31.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,841,807 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 110.3%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 9.9% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
| Range | 90.1% | 59.5% |
| Mean | 46.5% | 22.0% |
| Median | 39.8% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.3% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.0% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Puerto Rican (32.5%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and Pima (29.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
| Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |