Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Belgium Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,360,859 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,199,128 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 3.1%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lithuanian	Immigrants from Belgium
Minimum	7.6%	3.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	92.4%	96.5%
Mean	26.4%	18.5%
Median	18.0%	13.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.5%	9.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	34.4%	21.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	22.9%	11.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	22.4%	16.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	22.2%	16.3%

Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Belgium by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Korean (14.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Croatian (14.0%, a difference of 0.53%), Estonian (14.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Asia	99.6 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 13.9%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Zimbabweans	99.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.3%
Poles	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%