Yuman vs Dutch West Indian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yuman
Dutch West Indian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Yuman
Dutch West Indians
21.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Dutch West Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,221,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,367,867 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 32.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yuman | Dutch West Indian |
Minimum | 5.0% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.7% | 95.5% |
Mean | 32.7% | 32.3% |
Median | 34.3% | 29.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.9% | 42.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.3% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.5% | 20.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Dutch West Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Pima (20.2%, a difference of 5.7%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 6.6%), Native/Alaskan (19.6%, a difference of 8.6%), Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |