Yakama vs Lumbee Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Lumbee
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Lumbee
15.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Lumbee Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,879 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,248,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 32.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Lumbee |
Minimum | 5.5% | 9.1% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 58.5% |
Range | 27.9% | 49.5% |
Mean | 16.6% | 24.5% |
Median | 13.8% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Lumbee by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Paiute (15.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Pima (20.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and Crow (19.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |