Yakama vs Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Yakama
Lumbee
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Yakama
Lumbee
29.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.7%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Lumbee Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,894,634 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 29.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,106,764 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 32.7%, a difference of 10.4%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 15.4% |
| Maximum | 54.0% | 57.9% |
| Range | 47.0% | 42.5% |
| Mean | 29.8% | 36.3% |
| Median | 29.8% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.6% | 30.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 42.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Lumbee by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Apache (29.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (29.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Seminole (29.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Hopi (30.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Puerto Rican (29.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Houma (32.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 29.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 29.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 29.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |