Ute vs Creek Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Creek
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Ute
Creek
18.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Creek Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,132,597 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,600,877 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 7.2%.

Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Creek |
Minimum | 13.7% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 86.3% | 93.3% |
Mean | 51.5% | 32.5% |
Median | 50.6% | 23.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.1% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.2% | 49.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 65.1% | 32.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.5% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.1% | 23.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Creek by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Blackfeet (18.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (18.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (18.6%, a difference of 0.27%), French Canadian (18.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Ottawa (18.6%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Pennsylvania German (20.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Cherokee (19.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Inupiat (19.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovak (19.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and Dutch West Indian (19.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 20.0% |