Ute vs Immigrants from Dominica Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Dominica
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Dominica
18.5%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Dominica Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,132,597 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,251,177 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Dominica |
| Minimum | 13.7% | 9.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 86.3% | 90.6% |
| Mean | 51.5% | 30.2% |
| Median | 50.6% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.1% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.2% | 36.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 65.1% | 19.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.5% | 23.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.1% | 22.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Immigrants from Dominica by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Blackfeet (18.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (18.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Comanche (18.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Scotch-Irish (18.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Hungarian (18.5%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominica are Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Chippewa (18.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Chickasaw (19.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |