Turkish vs Ukrainian Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Ukrainian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Turks
Ukrainians
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
POVERTY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Ukrainian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,287,905 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.845 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Ukrainian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 18.0% | 98.7% |
Mean | 9.0% | 23.6% |
Median | 8.7% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 27.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 26.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Ukrainians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Austrian (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Swiss (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Germans | 98.1 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ukrainians | 97.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.2% |