Bulgarian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Chinese
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,354,998 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 8.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 36.8% | 56.0% |
| Range | 36.4% | 53.7% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 14.3% |
| Median | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Norwegian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Cypriot (13.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (12.9%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |