Creek vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Creek
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Creek
Chinese
21.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,951,590 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 80.6%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Chinese |
Minimum | 6.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 90.0% | 56.0% |
Range | 83.7% | 53.7% |
Mean | 30.0% | 14.3% |
Median | 28.4% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.4% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.2% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.1% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Creek by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Ute (21.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Dutch West Indian (21.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |