Czech vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Czech
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Czechs
Chinese
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,035,895 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 15.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.42% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 59.4% | 56.0% |
Range | 59.0% | 53.7% |
Mean | 13.9% | 14.3% |
Median | 12.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Greek (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Asia (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Croatian (13.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Estonians | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |