Tongan vs Ukrainian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Ukrainian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Ukrainians
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Ukrainian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,134,896 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.842 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Ukrainian |
Minimum | 5.1% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 22.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 17.6% | 99.6% |
Mean | 11.8% | 26.3% |
Median | 11.2% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 22.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 29.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 29.1% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Ukrainians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |