Tongan vs Immigrants from Poland Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Poland
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Poland
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Poland Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,710,065 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 0.34%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Poland |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 22.7% | 48.3% |
| Range | 17.6% | 44.7% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 13.3% |
| Median | 11.2% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Poland by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Russian (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Greece (11.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |