Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Iroquois
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Iroquois
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,443,448 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,755,154 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 27.9%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.92% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 37.8% | 66.7% |
Range | 36.9% | 62.6% |
Mean | 18.1% | 27.9% |
Median | 18.0% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 33.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Scottish (15.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and South African (15.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Guyanese (19.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from El Salvador (19.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Vietnamese (19.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Ottawa (19.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Spanish American Indian (19.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.5% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |