Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Iroquois
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Iroquois
17.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
13.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,928,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 17.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,755,154 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 13.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.3% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 35.6% | 66.7% |
Range | 34.3% | 62.6% |
Mean | 15.0% | 27.9% |
Median | 14.0% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 33.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Ugandan (17.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Portugal (17.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and German Russian (17.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Spaniards | 20.5 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 19.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.1% |
Delaware | 18.8 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 16.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 13.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 13.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 13.3 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.3% |
Ugandans | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 11.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
German Russians | 10.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Guyanese (19.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from El Salvador (19.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Vietnamese (19.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Ottawa (19.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Spanish American Indian (19.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.5% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |