Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Iroquois
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Iroquois
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Iroquois Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,351,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,755,154 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 29.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Iroquois |
Minimum | 1.6% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 44.5% | 66.7% |
Range | 42.9% | 62.6% |
Mean | 15.0% | 27.9% |
Median | 12.7% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 33.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are English (15.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (15.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Irish (15.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Guyanese (19.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from El Salvador (19.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Vietnamese (19.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Ottawa (19.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Spanish American Indian (19.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.5% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |