Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,702,060 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,293,901 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Taiwanese	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Minimum	0.94%	0.92%
Maximum	14.4%	15.1%
Range	13.5%	14.1%
Mean	4.7%	4.8%
Median	4.1%	3.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.4%	2.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.8%	5.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.3%	2.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.2%	3.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.1%	3.5%

Demographics Similar to Taiwanese and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Celtic (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%