Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Pakistan Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,702,060 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,275,406 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Taiwanese	Immigrants from Pakistan
Minimum	0.94%	0.95%
Maximum	14.4%	27.3%
Range	13.5%	26.3%
Mean	4.7%	5.5%
Median	4.1%	4.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.4%	3.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.8%	6.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.3%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.2%	3.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.1%	3.6%

Demographics Similar to Taiwanese and Immigrants from Pakistan by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Celtic (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Palestinian (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%