Immigrants from Cuba vs Scandinavian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Scandinavian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Scandinavians
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Scandinavian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,497,975 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,288,786 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 0.64%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Scandinavian |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 17.8% |
| Maximum | 43.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.7% | 82.2% |
| Mean | 21.1% | 42.1% |
| Median | 20.7% | 32.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 58.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 36.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 24.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 24.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Scandinavians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |