Sudanese vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Chickasaw
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Chickasaw
15.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,935,814 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 19.5%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 89.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 89.1% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 31.9% |
| Median | 14.9% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 19.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.4% | 19.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Palestinian (15.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Panama (15.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Iraqi (15.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants (15.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Hmong (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 92.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 92.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 92.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 91.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Sudanese | 91.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 91.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Iraqis | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Hmong | 91.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.8 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 90.8 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |