Sudanese vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Jordanian
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Jordanians
15.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
74.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Jordanian Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,935,814 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,384,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 89.9% | 56.5% |
| Range | 89.1% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 22.1% |
| Median | 14.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 28.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.4% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Palestinian (15.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Panama (15.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Iraqi (15.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants (15.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Hmong (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 92.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 92.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 92.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 91.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Sudanese | 91.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 91.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Iraqis | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Hmong | 91.1 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.8 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.9% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 90.8 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are South African (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Israel (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Nigerian (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Central America | 83.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 81.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
| Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
| Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
| South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
| Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
| Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |