Sudanese vs Chickasaw Single Father Households
COMPARE
Sudanese
Chickasaw
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Sudanese
Chickasaw
2.4%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
13.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Chickasaw Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,938,737 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,211,099 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 13.7%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 6.8% |
| Range | 7.0% | 6.3% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| Median | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.73% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Households
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Ghanaian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Dutch (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Finns | 18.3 /100 | #212 | Poor 2.4% |
| Norwegians | 17.1 /100 | #213 | Poor 2.4% |
| Ethiopians | 16.6 /100 | #214 | Poor 2.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 15.9 /100 | #215 | Poor 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 14.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 2.4% |
| Dutch | 14.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 13.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 2.4% |
| Sudanese | 13.0 /100 | #219 | Poor 2.4% |
| Ghanaians | 12.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.1 /100 | #221 | Poor 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 11.9 /100 | #222 | Poor 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.0 /100 | #223 | Poor 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 10.6 /100 | #224 | Poor 2.4% |
| Marshallese | 9.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 9.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Japanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Cree (2.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Malaysian (2.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and Lumbee (2.8%, a difference of 0.97%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Malaysians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 2.8% |