Dutch vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Dutch
Pakistani
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Dutch
Pakistanis
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 533,855,440 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,174,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.99%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 0.74% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.3% | 97.5% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 23.5% |
| Median | 13.8% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 20.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are English (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |