Immigrants from Brazil vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 337,270,761 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,174,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 1.4%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Brazil	Pakistani
Minimum	1.6%	2.5%
Maximum	56.7%	100.0%
Range	55.1%	97.5%
Mean	15.1%	23.5%
Median	13.8%	16.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.9%	13.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.0%	27.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.2%	14.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.6%	20.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.6%	20.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are English (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| England	95.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.1%
Chileans	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	95.0 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Brazil	94.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 15.1%
Serbians	94.8 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	94.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 15.1%
Palestinians	94.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	94.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 15.1%
Dutch	94.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 15.1%
Sri Lankans	94.0 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Denmark	93.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	93.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.3%
Pakistanis	92.3 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.3%
English	92.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.3%
Portuguese	91.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Irish	91.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%