Spanish American vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American
Subsaharan African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Spanish Americans
Sub-Saharan Africans
13.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,163,136 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,378,936 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.72%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.3% | 99.2% |
Mean | 16.5% | 20.0% |
Median | 13.0% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Sub-Saharan Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Cree (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |