Bangladeshi vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Subsaharan African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Sub-Saharan Africans
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Subsaharan African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,334,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,378,936 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 2.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.9% | 99.2% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 20.0% |
| Median | 12.6% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 19.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 17.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Sub-Saharan Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Haitian (13.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Mexican (13.7%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.7% |