Cherokee vs Immigrants from Sudan Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
 Immigrants from Sudan
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Sudan
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Sudan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,337,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,962,035 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 2.0%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Sudan | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.75% | 
| Maximum | 54.1% | 40.5% | 
| Range | 52.4% | 39.8% | 
| Mean | 19.3% | 14.3% | 
| Median | 17.3% | 13.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 9.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 16.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 6.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 7.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 7.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Sudan by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Sudanese (14.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Liberian (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (14.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243  | Tragic 14.0%  | 
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244  | Tragic 14.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263  | Tragic 14.4%  |