Venezuelan vs Slovene Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Venezuelan
Slovene
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Venezuelans
Slovenes
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Venezuelan vs Slovene Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,310,735 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,900,549 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 0.76%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Venezuelan | Slovene |
Minimum | 2.3% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 37.3% | 67.0% |
Range | 35.0% | 61.1% |
Mean | 18.9% | 22.9% |
Median | 18.8% | 20.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.8% | 27.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Venezuelans and Slovenes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Venezuelans are Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (20.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Canada (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iraq (20.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |