Jordanian vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Zimbabweans
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,392,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.47%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 39.7% | 21.7% |
| Range | 36.8% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 10.3% |
| Median | 10.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Zimbabweans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |