Aleut vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Zimbabweans
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 9.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 21.7% |
| Range | 48.7% | 19.5% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 10.3% |
| Median | 12.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |