Peruvian vs Immigrants from Jordan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Peruvian
Immigrants from Jordan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Peruvians
Immigrants from Jordan
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Peruvian vs Immigrants from Jordan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 358,317,102 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,238,780 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 0.26%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Peruvian | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 4.4% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 56.3% | 58.2% |
Range | 51.9% | 51.9% |
Mean | 21.5% | 18.6% |
Median | 19.0% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Peruvians and Immigrants from Jordan by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Immigrants from Turkey (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Russia (19.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Paraguayan (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |