Pakistani vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pakistani
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pakistanis
Slavs
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,174,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 2.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Slavic |
Minimum | 2.5% | 0.51% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.7% |
Range | 97.5% | 80.2% |
Mean | 23.5% | 23.6% |
Median | 16.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 28.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 14.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.1% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are English (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |