Pakistani vs Peruvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pakistani
Peruvian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Pakistanis
Peruvians
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Peruvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,174,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,519,236 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.46%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Peruvian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.7% |
Range | 97.5% | 47.7% |
Mean | 23.5% | 17.5% |
Median | 16.7% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Peruvians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are English (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |