Dominican vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Dominican
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Dominicans
Slavs
23.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,076,345 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 23.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 50.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dominican | Slavic |
| Minimum | 6.6% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 52.5% | 80.7% |
| Range | 45.9% | 80.2% |
| Mean | 27.0% | 23.6% |
| Median | 26.2% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.6% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 15.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Dominicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Kiowa (23.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 0.65%), Apache (23.8%, a difference of 0.70%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |