Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Slavic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Slavs
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,103,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,780,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Slavic |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 57.5% | 80.7% |
| Range | 54.2% | 80.2% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 23.6% |
| Median | 17.6% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Slavs by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Albania (15.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
| Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |