Osage vs Zimbabwean Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Zimbabwean
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Osage
Zimbabweans
16.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
14.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Zimbabwean Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,587,587 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 16.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,821,414 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 25.8%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3308e/3308e4da0cfda912a498f7fea2620c31e33d2abb" alt="Osage vs Zimbabwean Single Male Poverty"
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 5.0% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 49.4% |
Range | 95.0% | 46.2% |
Mean | 31.8% | 14.7% |
Median | 23.8% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 16.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.1% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.6% | 10.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.61%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.91%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Japanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Italian (13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Senegalese (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Swedish (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |