Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Subsaharan African
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,444,154 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.83%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.64% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 22.8% | 62.5% |
Range | 22.2% | 61.7% |
Mean | 10.1% | 15.6% |
Median | 9.9% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |