Osage vs Immigrants from Malaysia Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Malaysia
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Malaysia
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Malaysia Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,686,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,184,405 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Minimum | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 28.6% | 16.9% |
Range | 27.7% | 16.4% |
Mean | 7.1% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.3% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |