Osage vs Nigerian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Nigerian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Nigerians
5.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
18.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
14.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Nigerian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,686,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,785,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.82%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Nigerian |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 28.6% | 17.3% |
| Range | 27.7% | 15.9% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Nigerians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Micronesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
| Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
| Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
| Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
| Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |