Norwegian vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Alaskan Athabascan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Alaskan Athabascans
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,584,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 13.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 6.0% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 46.4% | 94.0% |
| Mean | 24.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 23.2% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 51.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 31.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 28.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 28.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |