Native Hawaiian vs Canadian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Canadian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Canadians
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Canadian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,823,706 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,032,660 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Canadian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 33.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 30.7% | 98.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 23.8% |
| Median | 9.7% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 24.7% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Canadians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Portuguese (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |