Fijian vs French American Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Fijian
French American Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Fijians
French American Indians
12.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs French American Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,945,809 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,954,359 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.72%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Fijian | French American Indian |
Minimum | 3.8% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 29.3% | 36.3% |
Range | 25.4% | 32.2% |
Mean | 14.4% | 13.8% |
Median | 12.4% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and French American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Nicaraguan (12.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Ecuadorian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ghanaian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.4% |
Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |