Luxembourger vs Turkish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Turkish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Turks
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Turkish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,236,955 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 7.5%, a difference of 4.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 13.1% | 18.7% |
| Range | 12.7% | 16.3% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 7.1% |
| Median | 4.9% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Turks by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Greek (7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.75%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and Czech (7.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |