Luxembourger vs Filipino Family Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Filipino
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Filipinos
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Filipino Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,803,740 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 8.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Filipino |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 13.1% | 12.3% |
| Range | 12.7% | 10.4% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| Median | 4.9% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Filipinos by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Thai (6.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 0.61%), Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and Immigrants from Ireland (7.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |