Luxembourger vs Lithuanian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Lithuanian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Lithuanians
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Lithuanian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,473,448 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,202,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 0.50%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.32% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 13.1% | 31.6% |
Range | 12.7% | 29.6% |
Mean | 5.5% | 8.3% |
Median | 4.9% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Lithuanians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%), Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |