Cajun vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cajun
Tohono O'odham
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cajuns
Tohono O'odham
30.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,582,163 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 30.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,585,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 34.2%, a difference of 11.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cajun | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 6.8% | 23.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.2% | 76.7% |
Mean | 40.8% | 57.1% |
Median | 39.9% | 53.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.3% | 29.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.5% | 83.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 54.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 28.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 27.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Tohono O'odham by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.81%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 1.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 3.6%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |