Lumbee vs Tohono O'odham Currently Married
COMPARE
Lumbee
Tohono O'odham
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Lumbee
Tohono O'odham
39.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Tohono O'odham Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,298,299 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 39.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,730,067 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357 and weighted average of 36.8%, a difference of 8.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 17.4% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 57.2% | 57.6% |
| Range | 39.8% | 51.4% |
| Mean | 37.7% | 32.0% |
| Median | 38.3% | 35.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.5% | 21.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.5% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Tohono O'odham by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Puerto Rican (39.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Yup'ik (39.9%, a difference of 0.18%), British West Indian (39.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Black/African American (39.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (40.1%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Hopi (36.5%, a difference of 0.58%), Pima (35.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 40.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.9% |