Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Japan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Japan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Japan
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Japan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,202,329 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,424,982 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Japan |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 31.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.6% | 98.3% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 14.8% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Japan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Czech (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |